The Big Question Missing from the Google Diversity Debate

Dr. Nika White • August 12, 2017

You would probably need a Google Alert  to try and keep up with this story, but here’s a quick summary:  Google engineer James Damore recently distributed a 10-page internal memo  against Google’s gender diversity policies. In it, he lays out several arguments for why Google – and the tech industry in general – should not try to “force” gender equality, or reshape itself so that there’s a 50-50 balance. He says it’s just not biologically logical.

This week, Mr. Damore was fired.Mr. Damore apparently wrote the document  in response to Google’s efforts to address the gender gap in its company, seeing it as evidence of a culture hostile to dissenting viewpoints. Google swiftly dismissed him on the grounds that “portions of the memo violate our code of conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” What D&I leaders should be asking is not only where that line is, but whether this expectation was clearly communicated. Were there more employees who shared some of Mr. Damore’s sentiments leading to the bold position he decided to spell out and disseminate?  Were warning signs dismissed or ignored prior to the proportions reached by Mr. Damore?

We need to take a big step back to the point before he first thought to sit down at a computer to write his manifesto. The big question is, what about Google’s company culture made him feel that it would be okay – or necessary? The warning signs must have been there. I have to wonder what about Google’s culture allowed a senior software engineer – a leader on some level – to feel it would be okay to write and distribute to employees a 10-page manifesto speaking against the values of inclusion when Google supposedly views inclusion as an asset. To me, this is what we need to dig into. To write personal reflections is one thing, but to have the confidence to distribute it to company employees is arrogant. People who tend to make “boss” moves like that have no situational awareness, feel justified, or simply don’t care about the consequences. We need only to look at some of the points in his argument to know that he was not writing from a framework that includes a mature and full understanding of diversity. It’s possible that Google did, in fact, present good information and opportunities for discussion that Mr. Damore simply rejected or failed to grasp. But taking his argument and document at face value, several myths he perpetrates are striking, including these two:

  1. He thinks D&I is matter of The Right versus The Left, conservative versus liberal. That is the kind of message Google might have inadvertently delivered even before it decided to formally tackle diversity issues. Even though political ideology might never have appeared in any of the formal training materials or discussions, was there something about Google’s culture that would let politics override the true intent? And was that tendency openly addressed and remedied?
  2. Addressing inequities for specific groups is “restricting” and “discriminatory.” Here, it was Google’s responsibility to make sure that employees understood that different groups have different experiences, and that there is sometimes a need to address those within peer groups of shared experience. Equity and equality are NOT the same. While equity and equality are two strategies designed to produce fairness, equity is giving everyone what they need to be successful, while equality is treating everyone the same . Equality aims to promote fairness, but it can only work if everyone starts from the same place and needs the same help.

The story has already spun in many different directions and likely won’t disappear soon. Immediately after Mr. Damore was fired, people were concerned that other employees would no longer feel free to express themselves. I personally don’t buy that: it sounds more like an excuse to tolerate the most offensive and critical parts his argument, namely that women are generally biologically unfit for the work. Engaging in respectful questioning and sharing different opinions and perspectives is not what’s at risk, but a culture of equity, acceptance, inclusion and equality is at risk.

There is one thing Mr. Damore got right. He writes, “Philosophically, I don’t think we should do arbitrary social engineering of tech just to make it appealing to equal portions of both men and women. For each of these changes, we need principle reasons for why it helps Google; that is, we should be optimizing for Google—with Google’s diversity being a component of that.” The business case was missing for Mr. Damore; it is the organization’s responsibility to ensure that the business case for diversity is clear. Communicating the business case and communicating it often is key.

It’s our responsibility as leaders to take big, bold steps when it comes to fostering diversity and inclusion in the workplace. However, those steps must occur on solid ground. There should be a clear understanding of what is happening, and why, and there must be appropriate outlets for the inevitable pushback.

If you’re thinking about requesting or implementing diversity programming in your organization, don’t let the Google controversy have a chilling effect. In fact, let it stoke your fire to be smart about your messaging, and frank about your organization, and brutally honest about the needs. Inclusion is about making diversity of thought, and people with ideas like Mr. Damore’s need to know that they will be heard – even if not necessarily agreed with.

Read more from The Human Shift on Substack, where I share long-form essays on leadership, culture, and how we work and live.

Share this Content:

By Nika White August 31, 2026
Leaders often wonder why their teams aren't doing more of something. Speaking up. Collaborating. Taking initiative. Thinking creatively. The answer is sometimes found in the everyday moments that seem unrelated. People pay attention to what leaders actually do. If a leader says they value reflection but never slows down, people learn that speed matters more. If a leader encourages honest feedback but becomes defensive when receiving it, people learn that honesty has limits. If a leader talks about work-life balance but sends emails late into the evening, people learn what the real expectation is. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored unspoken expectations . Most cultures are shaped less by formal messages than by repeated observations. A Reframe Whether you realize it or not, you're always giving people permission. The question is what you're giving them permission to do. One Simple Practice Complete this sentence: "My team probably believes it's okay to..." Write down the first answer that comes to mind. Then ask yourself whether your behavior has been teaching that lesson intentionally. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader tells her team they don't need to respond after hours. Then she notices she's emailing at 10:30 every night. She schedules those messages to send the next morning instead. Nothing about the policy changes. Everything about the signal does. Question to Consider If people copied your leadership habits exactly, what kind of culture would they create? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What's one behavior of yours that may be communicating more loudly than your words?
By Nika White August 24, 2026
People pay attention to what leaders celebrate. They pay even closer attention to what leaders react to. A frustrated sigh. A quick interruption. An impatient email. A defensive response to feedback. None of these moments seem particularly significant on their own. But people are always learning from them. They begin to understand which questions are welcome. Which mistakes feel risky. Which conversations require extra caution. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored how silence often becomes a cultural signal. Silence rarely appears without first being taught what feels safe to say. Your reactions become part of that lesson. A Reframe People don't simply hear your expectations. They study your reactions. One Simple Practice The next time someone brings you unexpected news, resist the urge to respond immediately. Take one slow breath. Become curious before becoming corrective. That small pause often changes the entire conversation. What This Looks Like In Practice A team member admits she made an error that will delay a project. Instead of immediately asking how it happened, the leader asks, "Tell me what you've learned so far." The conversation shifts from self-protection to problem-solving. The mistake still gets addressed. The person doesn't leave feeling like the mistake defines them. Question to Consider What have your reactions been teaching people lately? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. If someone made a mistake today, would they feel comfortable bringing it to you quickly?
By Nika White August 17, 2026
Most leaders spend a lot of time thinking about what they're going to say. They prepare for difficult conversations. They organize their thoughts. They choose their words carefully. All of that matters. But long after people forget the details of the conversation, they usually remember something else. They remember how they felt. Did they leave feeling encouraged? Did they leave feeling smaller? Did they leave feeling trusted? Did they leave feeling like they had to be careful? Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored the idea of leadership aftermath. What people carry after interacting with you shapes culture in ways that are easy to overlook because they happen quietly. Most leaders don't intentionally create emotional tone. They create it anyway. A Reframe Every interaction leaves something behind. The question isn't whether you're shaping the emotional climate. It's what you're leaving in it. One Simple Practice At the end of your next one-on-one meeting, don't evaluate what you said first. Instead ask yourself: "If I were on the other side of that conversation, how would I describe how it felt?" Notice what comes to mind before you analyze it. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader finishes a performance conversation feeling relieved because she finally addressed a difficult issue. Later that day she asks herself how the conversation may have felt for the employee. She realizes she spent most of the meeting explaining expectations and very little time asking questions. The next conversation feels different because she changes the experience, not just the message. Question to Consider When people leave a conversation with you, what do you hope they carry with them? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Think about a leader you've never forgotten. What do you remember most: what they said or how they consistently made you feel?
By Nika White August 10, 2026
Leaders often celebrate when complaints decrease. Concerns become less frequent. Questions slow down. Conflict seems to disappear. Sometimes that's a sign of growth. Sometimes it's a sign that people have stopped bringing things forward. Earlier in The Human Shift, When Teams Stop Telling You Things , we explored silence as a cultural signal. Silence is not always agreement. Sometimes it is adaptation. People learn what feels worth raising. What feels safe to discuss. What is likely to go nowhere. A Reframe A lack of problems does not automatically mean a healthy culture. One Simple Practice Ask someone you trust: "What is something people may be hesitant to tell me?" Listen without defending. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader notices fewer concerns being raised in meetings. Instead of assuming everything is fine, she creates space for honest conversation. What emerges isn't crisis. It's information that had simply been waiting for a safer place to surface. Question to Consider What information might be missing from the conversations you're having? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When people disagree with you, do they usually tell you?
By Nika White August 4, 2026
Many people end the day feeling exhausted. Their calendar was full. Their inbox was active. Their attention was constantly moving. Yet when asked what mattered most about the day, they hesitate. Activity and engagement are not the same thing. One creates motion. The other creates meaning. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Subtle Drift Into Disconnection, we explored how disconnection often develops through small moments. One of those moments occurs when activity becomes so constant that reflection disappears. A Reframe Being busy answers the question, "What did I do?" Being engaged answers the question, "What mattered?" One Simple Practice At the end of the day, ask yourself: "What was the most meaningful moment today?" Write down the answer. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader begins ending each workday with a short reflection. After a few weeks, she notices that the moments she remembers most are rarely the busiest ones. They're the conversations. The insights. The moments of connection. Question to Consider If someone asked what mattered most about your day yesterday, what would you say? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What is one meaningful moment from this week that you don't want to forget?
By Nika White July 27, 2026
Many leaders pride themselves on being available. Their door is open. Their inbox is monitored. Their phone is always nearby. The intention is usually good. But constant availability can create unintended consequences. People begin relying on immediate access instead of developing judgment. Leaders become increasingly interrupted. Everyone feels busy. Few people feel clear. Earlier in The Human Shift, When Responsibility Becomes Identity we explored how constant availability often grows from the belief that leadership means being accessible at all times. A Reframe Being available is not the same thing as being supportive. One Simple Practice Choose one part of your day where you are intentionally unavailable. Protect it. Use that time for thinking, reflection, or focused work. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader blocks ninety minutes each morning for uninterrupted work. Initially, people push back. Within a few weeks, team members begin solving more problems independently and bringing better questions when they do connect. Question to Consider What might your team learn if you were slightly less available? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What is one boundary you've been reluctant to establish?
By Nika White July 20, 2026
Trust rarely disappears overnight. Most of the time, it fades gradually. A missed follow-up. A rushed response. A concern that never gets revisited. A promise that seemed small at the time. People often think trust is built through big moments. In reality, it is shaped through consistency. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Weight of Unspoken Expectations, we explored leadership aftermath and what people carry after interactions. Trust is often built or weakened in those moments long after the conversation ends. A Reframe Trust is less about grand gestures and more about repeated experiences. One Simple Practice Think about one commitment you've made recently. Follow up on it today. Even if the update is simply: "I haven't forgotten." What This Looks Like In Practice A leader tells a team member she'll revisit a concern. Weeks pass. The concern itself becomes less important than the silence. When she circles back, even without a complete answer, trust begins to repair. Question to Consider What commitment have you made that someone may still be waiting on? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When someone earns your trust, what do they consistently do?
By Nika White July 13, 2026
Most leaders want to be understood. That's normal. The challenge comes when the need to be understood starts driving the conversation. You explain again. You provide more context. You clarify your intentions. You revisit the decision. And yet somehow, you still leave feeling misunderstood. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Stories We Tell Under Pressure, we explored how pressure shapes the stories we tell ourselves. One of the most common stories leaders carry is: "If people understood me better, this would be easier." Sometimes that's true. Sometimes the real issue is that understanding and agreement are not the same thing. A Reframe Being understood is valuable. Needing everyone to understand you can become exhausting. One Simple Practice The next time you feel the urge to explain yourself again, pause and ask: "Am I seeking clarity, or am I seeking validation?" Answer honestly. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader shares a decision with her team. A few people disagree. Her first instinct is to keep explaining the reasoning. Instead, she allows the disagreement to exist without trying to resolve everyone's discomfort. The conversation becomes more productive because she is no longer trying to manage every reaction. Question to Consider Where are you spending energy trying to be understood by people who have already heard you? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What's something you've been explaining repeatedly that may not need another explanation?
By Nika White July 6, 2026
One of the first signs that capacity is stretched isn't exhaustion. It's compression. Everything starts feeling equally important. Every email. Every request. Every conversation. Every decision. There is no hierarchy. Just urgency. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Cost of Constant Readiness , we explored how constant readiness changes perception. When the nervous system stays activated for too long, discernment becomes harder to access. The result is that everything begins competing for the same attention. A Reframe When everything feels urgent, the problem is often not workload. It's a lack of space. One Simple Practice At the beginning of your day, identify one thing that truly matters. Not three. Not five. One. Let that become your anchor. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader begins every morning reviewing a long list of tasks. By lunchtime, she feels behind. When she shifts her focus to identifying the most important outcome for the day, her decision-making improves and her stress decreases. The work doesn't disappear. The relationship to the work changes. Question to Consider What would happen if not everything deserved equal access to your attention? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What is taking up attention right now that may not actually deserve it?
By Nika White June 29, 2026
Many people think they're listening... What they're actually doing is waiting. Waiting to respond. Waiting to explain. Waiting to clarify. Waiting to prove they understand. We've all done it. The challenge is that people can feel the difference. When someone feels truly heard, their nervous system settles. When they feel managed, redirected, or rushed, something else happens. Earlier in The Human Shift, When Teams Stop Telling You Things, we explored how silence often becomes a cultural signal. Many people stop sharing because they've learned they are being heard only enough to move the conversation forward. A Reframe Listening is not gathering information. Listening is creating enough space for understanding to emerge. One Simple Practice In your next conversation, wait three seconds after someone finishes speaking before responding. Just three seconds. Notice what happens. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader receives feedback from a team member. Instead of immediately explaining her perspective, she pauses. The employee continues talking. What emerged in those few extra seconds was the actual concern. Not the polished version. The real one. Question to Consider How often are you listening to understand versus listening to respond? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When was the last time someone made you feel completely heard?